US Banks Are OK — China Peace Plan — Saudi King Invites Iran President — First and Last Crypto Bailout — Economic Report of President — Celebrities Charged — Yellen Warns Russia and China on Dollar

US BANK LOAN DELINQUENCIES

There has been a lot of buzz recently concerning a possible US “banking crisis”. Such buzz is usually accompanied by the claim that all banks everywhere are currently at risk of failure. The authors of such stories inevitably advise the reader to purchase “sound” money (whatever that means) such as “gold” or silver. The Internet is full of these rumours and stories. However, it appears that none of the so-called “experts” who write these articles (ad infinitum) have examined the delinquency rate of US bank loans. BOOM has and it may surprise readers to learn that the rate on “all loans” is currently at the lowest level in 40 years. You can check easily yourself by searching for “Delinquency Rate on All Loans, All Commercial Banks FRED“.

You can also look at the sub-headings at FRED for —

Delinquency Rate on Business Loans, Delinquency Rate on Consumer Loans, Delinquency Rate on Credit Card Loans, Deliquency Rate on Loans secured by Real Estate, Delinquency Rate on Single Family Residential Mortgages, Delinquency Rate on All Loans and Leases Secured by Real Estate, Single-Family Residential Mortgages, Delinquency Rate on Commercial and Industrial Loans, Delinquency Rate on Commercial Real Estate Loans (excluding Farmland).

Alternatively, you can continue to read the DOOM and Gloom authors all over the Internet while you “stack” your physical gold bars in the basement, buy Bitcoins and keep your single shotgun functional.

CHINA PEACE PLAN

In case you have not heard from the mainstream media, China has a Peace Plan for Ukraine which it is discussing with Russia. There are recent reports that Ukraine has also expressed interest in having China play a mediating role.

If you wish to examine the 12 Point Plan, you can search for it using the words — “China’s Position on the Political Settlement of the Ukraine Crisis”. It makes for interesting reading.

https://www.fmprc.gov.cn/mfa_eng/zxxx_662805/202302/t20230224_11030713.html

SAUDI KING INVITES IRAN LEADERSHIP

Another report which the mainstream media may not have brought to your attention concerns the plan by Saudi Arabia to welcome the President of Iran in a State visit to meet the King of Saudi Arabia.

An Iranian official reportedly said that the King of Saudi Arabia had issued a formal invitation to the Iranian President, Ebrahim Raisi, to visit Riyadh. Raisi is said to have “welcomed” the invite from King Salman. The date has not yet been set. Such an official head of state visit has not taken place in over 20 years. 

Of course, the US will see this as an “expansionist threat” from China and a betrayal from Saudi Arabia. But there is little they can do about this outbreak of Peace and Goodwill.

THE FIRST AND LAST CRYPTO BAILOUT

Last week, BOOM explained how the Federal Reserve saved all the depositors of Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) and, subsequent to that, the Crypto market — all in one operation. Janet Yellen, the United States Secretary of the Treasury has since said that such a full bail out of all depositors is a special case and will not apply to other bank failures.

So, it is clear that there was, indeed, a very special large depositor of SVB who was rescued for special reasons, just as BOOM hypothesized. Of course, the identity of that large depositor which had some strong connection to the Crypto market will be kept a closely guarded secret. But it is not hard to guess if you start by perhaps looking at Circle Internet Financial LLC, a private company registered in Dublin Ireland and a Hong Kong-based company called Tether. There are plenty of other possible candidates to research but the quest is futile. Why? Because this will be the first and last bail out of the Crypto world by the Fed.

ECONOMIC REPORT OF THE PRESIDENT

Last week, the White House Council of Economic Advisers released the Economic Report of the President to the Congress. The White House Council has only three members. It is chaired by Cecilia Elena Rouse, a frequent economic adviser to various Democratic Presidents. Notably, she is a director of T. Rowe Price Equity Mutual Funds and an advisory board member of T. Rowe Price Fixed Income Mutual Funds. The other two members are Jared Bernstein and Heather Boushey.

Chapter 8 of the Report is titled “Digital Assets: Relearning Economic Principles”. The first sentence is not what you would expect in a report on digital assets — “Multiple financial crises have struck the United States during the last two centuries. Many of these crises have been caused by institutions that function like banks but are not registered or regulated as banks, so-called shadow banks”.

 BOOM does not understand why they would choose to start this chapter with such an odd introduction. But perhaps it is not so odd?

It then goes on to say “This chapter primarily examines crypto assets, whose proponents have been relearning the lessons from previous financial crises the hard way.” This suggests that the authors of the Report are convinced that the world of Crypto represents a risk of financial crisis to the well established, conventional financial system. The recent failure last November of the FTX Crypto exchange and the events of the last two weeks appear to have been much more consequential to the financial system than is generally recognised.

The report also says –“crypto assets to date do not appear to offer investments with any fundamental value, nor do they act as an effective alternative to fiat money, improve financial inclusion, or make payments more efficient; instead, their innovation has been mostly about creating artificial scarcity in order to support crypto assets’ prices—and many of them have no fundamental value. This raises the question of the role of regulation in protecting consumers, investors, and the rest of the financial system from panics, crashes, and fraud related to crypto assets”.

This statement concerning no fundamental value and protecting the financial system is a strong one and it is safe to assume that this is the position of the US Government.

Further, this statement underlines that position. “Although the underlying technologies are a clever solution for the problem of how to execute transactions without a trusted authority, crypto assets currently do not offer widespread economic benefits,” and “They are largely speculative investment vehicles and are not an effective alternative to fiat currency. Also, they are too risky at present to function as payment instruments or to expand financial inclusion.”

The risks presented by crypto assets stem from excessive speculation, high leverage, run risk, environmental harm from crypto asset mining, and fraudulent activities that harm retail investors and corporations”. And “much of the activity in the Crypto asset space is covered by existing regulations and regulators are expanding their capabilities to bring a large number of new entities under compliance”.

It looks like the heavy hand of US government oversight and regulation is about to get much heavier in regard to the world of Crypto. Take note Crypto enthusiasts. Last week’s BOOM editorial accurately stated “BOOM expects the Fed to take a very hard look at how the Stablecoin market operates (or is supposed to operate) and at how the more general Crypto market operates, especially in regard to any associated derivative risks which may cause systemic risk to the entire Crypto market.”

Strangely, a diagram is presented titled “A Taxonomy of Digital Assets and Central Bank Money” which presents CBDC’s (Central Bank Digital Currencies) as if they already exist when they don’t (except in China, the Bahamas, Jamaica and Nigeria). 

It also presents Cash as being contained within another concept labelled “Central Bank Money”. BOOM suspects that they are referring to Central Bank Reserves here but cannot understand why Cash is encircled within it in the diagram. And the diagram represents “Crypto Assets” as containing NFT’s (Non Fungible Tokens) and Cryptocurrencies when the report seems at pains to explain that those digital assets are certainly not currencies. Then there is another category of “Stablecoins” which strangely overlaps between “Crypto Assets and Cryptocurrencies”.

BOOM understands that this diagram has been included to help poorly informed readers. However, the diagram is potentially confusing and terminology used suggests that the authors are struggling to understand the subject matter themselves.

Much discussion follows. However, these bold headline statements appear to clarify — Cryptocurrencies Generally Do Not Perform All the Functions of Money as Effectively as Sovereign Money, such as the U.S. Dollar

and

There Have Been Limited Economic Benefits from DLT Technology

Further sections deal with The FedNow Instant Payment System where this rather strange statement appears — “a larger, more fast-paced economy is starting to arise”. BOOM cannot understand this at all. Quite frankly, what the hell are they talking about? It suggests a hidden agenda. However, there is a clarifying statement — “FedNow is not a digital asset

Under Central Bank Digital Currencies section, they state “11 countries have launched CBDCs “ and then link to an Atlantic Council global map that strongly suggests that CBDC’s are currently launched in 11 nations. However, a close examination of the detail only reveals 4 – Nigeria, the Bahamas, Jamaica, Eastern Caribbean. Strangely it leaves out China where the E Yuan has been in trials for some years and is effectively “launched”.

The map also has other categories Pilot (18), Development (32), Research (39), Inactive (15) and Cancelled (2). The map therefore suggests strongly that CBDC’s are inevitable in 89 nations.

BOOM suspects that this is the hidden agenda being brought forward by the Report – “CBDC’s are inevitable so roll over and accept them”.

But this sentence begs doubt — “a potential US CBDC could help ensure that such payment systems are aligned with the principles of human rights, democratic values, and privacy”. A cynic, such as BOOM, would suggest that the words “could help” should have read “will help”. But, BOOM is always suspicious of politicians making promises that they can’t keep.

BOOM is keenly aware that Electronic Cash may be inevitable in a world of falling working age populations. However, BOOM would expect it to be non-programmable, anonymous and issued by the Treasury – not by the Central Banks.

Please note that the words “programmable” and “anonymous” do not appear anywhere in the entire report. A strange omission perhaps when discussing CBDC’s?

The entire report is 513 pages long with the section on Digital Assets being 35 pages long. It is a daunting task, but readers who are interested in the future of money should certainly try to read it to see what hidden messages and hidden agendas are being considered by the present US Government.

Reference: https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/ERP-2023.pdf

US CELEBRITIES CHARGED BY SEC

There have been reports that a number of US celebrities have been charged by the SEC (Securities and Exchange Commission) for miss-representing Cryptos. Everyone with the exception of two have reportedly agreed to a collective $400,000 payment in disgorgement, interest and penalties to settle the charges, which, were not an admittance or denial of guilt.

In one report, Gary Gensler, the Chairman of the SEC is quoted as saying “This case demonstrates again the high risk investors face when crypto asset securities are offered and sold without proper disclosure“.

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/sec-hits-lindsay-lohan-jake-paul-soulja-boy-and-others-crypto-fraud-charges

YELLEN WARNS RUSSIA AND CHINA ON DOLLAR

America seems to love warning and threatening other nations as if it has the moral right to do so. Janet Yellen, the US Secretary of the Treasury, said this last week at the House of Representatives Appropriations Subcommittee.I certainly want to see the dollar remain as the world’s reserve currency, and there is a motivation that Russia and China have to try to develop another system that avoids the use of the dollar.”

This is America’s long term foreign policy goal and the reason for its hundreds of military bases scattered around the globe – as they say, straight from the horses mouth.

The exorbitant privilege of issuing the world’s so-called “reserve currency” is one that allows America to create dollars from thin air and then pay for imported goods and services provided by other nations, insisting that they take only US Dollars as settlement. The US also insists that its exports to other nations (especially weapons) are paid for with US dollars. Offshore tax haven banks are therefore incentivised to create loans to large corporations principally denominated in US Dollars (as long as the US economy remains the largest national economy on Earth).

Russia and China are seeking to minimise the use of the US Dollar and thus, they are strongly denounced as a “threat” to “democracy” – not to the exorbitant privilege. Words are carefully chosen by the actors on the world stage.

China has committed the unforgivable sin of expanding the size of its economy to rival that of the US. Until now, they have been willing to accept US Dollars as settlement for the vast majority of its trades. However, that is rapidly changing. And that is why we have so much Geopolitical tension at present as the US seeks to maintain its dominance. However, it is a battle that the US will inevitably lose as many billions of people in many disparate nations move steadily towards a multi-polar world of trade and capital settlements where the Chinese Yuan, the Russian Rouble and the Indian Rupee rise in offshore volumes, triggered by demand. This transition will be many decades in its evolution. BOOM suspects 50 – 100 years before a multi-polar world of currencies is accepted. But it may be much shorter if the US continues to threaten other nations and isolate itself. 

QB Explained

and BOOM’s Perfect Economy

In economics, things work until they don’t. Until next week, make your own conclusions, do your own research. BOOM does not offer investment advice.

Read On — You are reading the BOOM BLOG which contains all Weekly Editorials ……..

Subscribe for Free at the Newspaper Website.
The Newspaper does not contain all Weekly Editorials — just the current week
The BOOM NEWSPAPER Link:
 BOOM Finance & Economics (boomfinanceandeconomics.com)

=================================

HOW MOST MONEY IS CREATED

BANKS CREATE FRESH NEW MONEY OUT OF THIN AIR
(but they always need a Borrower to do so)

THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS A DEPOSIT

BANKS PURCHASE SECURITIES, THEY DON’T MAKE LOANS

BANKS DON’T TAKE DEPOSITS, THEY BORROW YOUR MONEY

Watch this short 15 minutes video and learn as Professor Richard Werner brilliantly explains how the banking system and financial sector really work.

How is Most New Money Created ?

LOANS CREATE DEPOSITS — that is how almost all new money is created in the economy (by commercial banks making loans).

From the Bank of England Quarterly Bulletin Q1 2014    —
“Whenever a bank makes a loan, it simultaneously creates a matching deposit in the borrower’s bank account, thereby creating new money.“Most money in the modern economy is in the form of bank deposits, which are created by commercial banks themselves”.

YouTube Video —  https://www.bankofengland.co.u/quarterly-bulletin/2014/q1/money-in-the-modern-economy-an-introduction

and https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ziTE32hiWdk

Paper: Money in the Modern Economy —  CLICK HERE

PDF https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/-/media/boe/files/quarterly-bulletin/2014/money-creation-in-the-modern-economy.pdf

Most economists are unaware of this and even ignore the banking & finance sectors in their econometric models.

On 25th April 2017, the central bank of Germany, the Bundesbank, released a statement on this matter —

“In terms of volume, the majority of the money supply is made up of book money, which is created through transactions between banks and domestic customers. Sight deposits are an example of book money: sight deposits are created when a bank settles transactions with a customer, ie it grants a credit, say, or purchases an asset and credits the corresponding amount to the customer’s bank account in return. This means that banks can create book money just by making an accounting entry: according to the Bundesbank’s economists, “this refutes a popular misconception that banks act simply as intermediaries at the time of lending – i.e. that banks can only grant credit using funds placed with them previously as deposits by other customers”. By the same token, excess central bank reserves are not a necessary precondition for a bank to grant credit (and thus create money).”

Reference: https://www.bundesbank.de/en/tasks/topics/how-money-is-created-667392

The Reserve Bank of Australia (Australia’s central bank) has also contributed to the issue in a speech by Christopher Kent, the Assistant Governor on September 19th 2018.“…… the vast bulk of broad money consists of bank deposits”“Money can be created …….. when financial intermediaries make loans““In the first instance, the process of money creation requires a willing borrower.”“It’s also worth emphasizing that the process of money creation is not the result of the actions of any single bank – rather, the banking system as a whole acts to create money.”

Disclaimer:   All content is presented for educational and/or entertainment purposes only. Under no circumstances should it be mistaken for professional investment advice, nor is it at all intended to be taken as such. The commentary and other contents simply reflect the opinion of the authors alone on the current and future status of the markets and various economies. It is subject to error and change without notice.The presence of a link to a website does not indicate approval or endorsement of that web site or any services, products, or opinions that may be offered by them.

Neither the information nor any opinion expressed constitutes a solicitation to buy or sell any securities nor investments. Do NOT ever purchase any security or investment without doing your own and sufficient research.  Neither BOOM Finance and Economics.com nor any of its principals or contributors are under any obligation to update or keep current the information contained herein. The principals and related parties may at times have positions in the securities or investments referred to and may make purchases or sales of these securities and investments while this site is live. The analysis contained is based on both technical and fundamental research.

Although the information contained is derived from sources which are believed to be reliable, they cannot be guaranteed.

Disclosure: We accept no advertising or compensation, and have no material connection to any products, brands, topics or companies mentioned anywhere on the site.

Fair Use Notice: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of issues of economic and social significance. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

====================================================================

MOLS Denmark

Leave a comment