The Death of US Capitalism — Covid Vaccine Outcomes — Euromomo shows that No Pandemic of Death Exists



On 7th March, BOOM wrote about the activities of the plunge protection team in saving the US stock markets. They had acted decisively on the previous Friday trading session on 5th March to rescue almost the entire US market with well coordinated buying that looked clearly initiated by a single finger making a single keystroke at exactly 11.28 am.

Last Thursday, 25th March, they clearly acted again. This time, it occurred at or about 2.30 pm. Broad based ETF’s such as IWM (Russell 2,000) , SPY (the S & P 500), DIA (the Dow Industrial Index), and QQQ (the Nasdaq index) were all suddenly hit by buying at exactly the same time — 2.30 pm.

However, this time, some stocks were clearly being favored over others. For example, in the FAANG and FAAMG stocks, a buying finger occured at 2.30 pm in Facebook but was pulled at 3.04 pm. Facebook’s price then resumed its fall. Similar patterns were seen in the others.

The buying finger hit Facebook at 2.30 pm and disappeared at 3.04 pm.
The buying finger hit Amazon at 2.32 pm and disappeared at 3.04 pm.
The buying finger hit Netflix at 2.30 pm and disappeared at 3.04 pm.
The buying finger hit Google at 2.30 pm and disappeared at 3.04 pm.
The buying finger hit Microsoft at 2.30 pm and disappeared at 3.04 pm.
The buying finger hit Apple at 2.32 pm and disappeared at 3.33 pm.

After falling all day, Cathie Wood’s ARK range of ETF’s were all also rescued at exactly 2.30 pm.
ARKK, ARKW ARKG, ARKQ, ARKF and PRNT had all fallen decisively earlier in the trading session and had recovered some of their falls. But by 2.30 pm they were clearly again under heavy selling pressure. Then the magic buying finger appeared as if from nowhere to arrest the plunge. However, they were NOT abandoned at 3.04 pm and continued to rise into the close.

Tesla’s intra-day pattern was identical. The magic finger appeared at 2.30pm to arrest a worrying tendency to fall. And then TSLA rose into the close.

BOOM cannot prove that these sudden events were caused by a single buying finger employed by the mysterious plunge protection team. The evidence is only circumstantial. But it looks very suspicious.
Is US capitalism so weak that these protections have to be put into place? And, if so, why?

On Friday, during the afternoon session, the US markets were all falling and looking increasingly weak until exactly 2.49 pm when the magic finger (again) got to work and hit the keyboard.

The last hour and a half of trading showed a remarkable recovery in almost all sectors to end the week on a high. The only sectors that did not rise were in media and entertainment.

At 2.49 pm, DIA, the Dow Industrial ETF was falling, down – 0.20%. It finished the day up 1.36 %
At 2.49 pm, SPY, the S & P 500 Index ETF was falling, down – 0.23%. It finished the day up 1.61%
At 2.49 pm, IWM, the Russell 2000  ETF was falling, down – 1.22%. It finished the day up 1.82 %
At 2.49 pm, QQQ, the Nasdaq Index ETF was falling, down – 0.80%. It finished the day up 1.50%

All of these giant ETFs began their remarkable rise at EXACTLY 2.49pm. Thousands of stocks had to respond. It’s that simple.

Cathie Wood’s ARK range of ETF’s looked absolutely terrible at 2.49 pm.
ARKK, ARKG, ARKQ, ARKW were all falling, down respectively – 4.6 %, – 3.41 %, – 2.21 %, – 4.22 %.
The magical buying finger hit them all and suddenly they started rising but their performance by the end of the day was not stellar. It may be all over for the ARK. Perhaps it is sinking?

Are we witnessing the end of US Capitalism? — with (1) Trillions of US Dollar Quantitative Easing from the central banks funding huge government deficit spending programs and (2) coordinated centrally controlled buying in stocks at critical junctures?

As BOOM said on 7th March, it certainly seems like a well organised, well coordinated buying team is working to rescue the US stock market from collapse again and again, at pre-determined timestamps. But that couldn’t be happening. Because that would mean that a centrally planned, coordinated action is repeatedly rescuing the “free markets” of America, the home of Capitalism. Perhaps this is just a different kind of Communism in action?


The Daily Expose UK published an article last week summarising the UK Government’s seventh report on adverse reactions to both the Pfizer/BioNTech and Oxford/AstraZeneca Covid vaccines that have occurred since the vaccine roll-out began on the 8th December 2020. This is a summary of the article —

The report collated data up to the 7th March via the MHRA Yellow Card Scheme. At that point, an estimated 10.9 million first doses of the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine and 11.7 million doses of the Oxford University/AstraZeneca vaccine, had been administered, and around one million second doses, mostly the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine, had been administered.

The Yellow Card Adverse Reactions reported show the total number of deaths due to the experimental Covid vaccines to be 526.

As of the 7th March the total number of blood disorders reported due to receiving one of the Covid vaccines was 3,787.

The total number of heart disorders was 3,426.
The total number of eye disorders (including total blindness 46 cases) was 3,988.
Total number of gastrointestinal disorders was 36,356.

But perhaps most worrying of all was the total number of nervous system disorders including brain damage, facial paralysis and strokes. That number was 68,797.

These are just the short term adverse reactions that were reported as at 7th March. The total of 116,880 represents 0.52 % of those injected. That’s 1 in 200 (and many adverse reactions may have not been recorded yet).

7th update on Adverse Reactions to Covid Vaccines released by UK Government



Last week, BOOM mentioned that the Absolute Risk Reduction in the clinical trials for the Pfizer/Biontech vaccine was 0.7 %

So, based upon the UK government report, it is looking like the average vaccine recipient in the UK is taking a risk of immediate adverse reaction of about 0.5 % (perhaps more) to achieve an absolute risk reduction from the virus of 0.7 %.  Nobody knows what the long term risks of Covid vaccination are yet.

These numbers seem rather inconsequential in the scheme of things. They suggest that the Covid vaccines will not be “the game changer”, especially with new mutations of the virus spreading around the globe. New mutations (called “variants” by the mainstream media) have been occurring from Day One in Wuhan. In the link below, you can check out all the “variants” and their many, many mutations in the Nextstrain database of Genomic Sample Results. The Dark Blue Dots are the original Wuhan virus — now a very small part of the phenomenon. By the way, the “variants” sound scary but may not be as aggressive as the original form of the virus.

Genomic epidemiology of novel coronavirus – Global subsampling
Maintained by the Nextstrain team. Enabled by data from GISAID
Showing 3,912 genomes sampled between Dec 2019 and Mar 2021.

Nextstrain Link:


Meanwhile, the data published last Thursday by Euromomo from 25 European nations (plus the UK and Israel) show clearly that absolute death numbers from all causes are sharply collapsing below average death rates. And this is happening in ALL age groups, even in the above 85 years age group.

There is no pandemic of excess deaths currently occurring — quite the opposite.



Perhaps all travel should be banned until it can be guaranteed that nobody will ever again die or get injured in an accident in an aircraft, train, boat, car, motorbike or bicycle? After all, surely we are not safe until we are all safe?

That last bizarre phrase which some politicians have now started repeating leads naturally onto the next subject ………..


Virtue Signaling  is a very powerful force these days. People with luxurious lifestyles and prosperity want to “save the world” or “save the people”. So they must identify possible threats first and foremost — two examples are global warming and the “horrible” virus. Then they must force their solutions on the people — to “do good”.  But especially to be seen to be doing good.

The zeal is all very religious. Mankind (in the past, it mainly involved the coercion of men) has been down this road many times. For example, the Crusades were all about show, bravado. And in World War One, men were recruited by shaming them to “do the right thing”. But now we have a more sophisticated technique called “nudging”.

Governments now employ teams of psychologists to “nudge” the people toward government directed policies. Such Nudge units were inspired by the work of Cass Sunstein, the author of a book called — you guessed it  — “Nudge” published in 2008. Nudge discusses how public and private organizations can help people make better choices in their daily lives. Yeah, sure.

In reality, what happens is this. Governments make suggestions to a public that they have previously primed for suggestibility. The best way to do that is to get the general public very scared first because fear generates increased levels of suggestibility very reliably in many, or most, people. Then you make suggestions which re-inforce what you want the gullible public to do —  “the shops will run out of food (or toilet paper), get down there fast”, “the vaccine supply chains are disrupted, get to the clinic as fast as possible”, “the hospitals are inundated with sick people, stay indoors”, “solar power will save the planet, so buy as soon as possible before the government subsidies run out”, the “vaccine is completely safe and effective”, so why wouldn’t you have it?  There are any number of purposes.

Of course, some would call this by its old fashioned names – Propaganda and Coercion. But surely that may be unkind when the protagonists are simply trying to save the world? In such a noble quest surely any methodology is justified?

These words were spoken in the concentration camps of WW2. “Walk this way, Madam, we have a nice warm shower for you after your long journey”. Lies from authority figures can sound very convincing.
Joseph Goebbels was the master Nazi propagandist.

His basic ideas were —

⦁    Avoid abstract ideas – appeal to the emotions.
⦁    Constantly repeat just a few ideas. Use stereotyped phrases.
⦁    Give only one side of the argument.
⦁    Continuously criticize your opponents.
⦁    Pick out one special “enemy” for special vilification.

You can read a short but excellent summary of Goebbels’ Principles of Propaganda at the link provided here. See if you can recognize any similarities with the messages you are currently receiving from your government and the mainstream media — you may be shocked.

Link:  Goebbels’ Principles of Propaganda


EMAIL: gerry {at}




Watch this short 15 minutes video and learn as Professor Richard Werner brilliantly explains how the banking system and financial sector really work.
How is Most New Money Created ?

LOANS CREATE DEPOSITS — that is how almost all new money is created in the economy (by commercial banks making loans).

From the Bank of England Quarterly Bulletin Q1 2014    —
“Whenever a bank makes a loan, it simultaneously creates a matching deposit in the borrower’s bank account, thereby creating new money.

“Most money in the modern economy is in the form of bank deposits, which are created by commercial banks themselves”.

Youtube Video —


Paper:  Money in the Modern Economy  PDF —  CLICK HERE

Quarterly Bulletins Index

Most economists are unaware of this and even ignore the banking & finance sectors in their econometric models.

On 25th April 2017, the central bank of Germany, the Bundesbank, released a statement on this matter —

“In terms of volume, the majority of the money supply is made up of book money, which is created through transactions between banks and domestic customers. Sight deposits are an example of book money: sight deposits are created when a bank settles transactions with a customer, ie it grants a credit, say, or purchases an asset and credits the corresponding amount to the customer’s bank account in return. This means that banks can create book money just by making an accounting entry: according to the Bundesbank’s economists, “this refutes a popular misconception that banks act simply as intermediaries at the time of lending – i.e. that banks can only grant credit using funds placed with them previously as deposits by other customers”. By the same token, excess central bank reserves are not a necessary precondition for a bank to grant credit (and thus create money).”

The Reserve Bank of Australia (Australia’s central bank) has also contributed to the issue in a speech by Christopher Kent, the Assistant Governor on September 19th 2018.
“…… the vast bulk of broad money consists of bank deposits”
“Money can be created …….. when financial intermediaries make loans
“In the first instance, the process of money creation requires a willing borrower.” 
“It’s also worth emphasizing that the process of money creation is not the result of the actions of any single bank – rather, the banking system as a whole acts to create money.”

Disclaimer:   All content is presented for educational and/or entertainment purposes only. Under no circumstances should it be mistaken for professional investment advice, nor is it at all intended to be taken as such. The commentary and other contents simply reflect the opinion of the authors alone on the current and future status of the markets and various economies. It is subject to error and change without notice.The presence of a link to a website does not indicate approval or endorsement of that web site or any services, products, or opinions that may be offered by them.

Neither the information nor any opinion expressed constitutes a solicitation to buy or sell any securities nor investments. Do NOT ever purchase any security or investment without doing your own and sufficient research.  Neither BOOM Finance and nor any of its principals or contributors are under any obligation to update or keep current the information contained herein. The principals and related parties may at times have positions in the securities or investments referred to and may make purchases or sales of these securities and investments while this site is live. The analysis contained is based on both technical and fundamental research.

Although the information contained is derived from sources which are believed to be reliable, they cannot be guaranteed.

Disclosure: We accept no advertising or compensation, and have no material connection to any products, brands, topics or companies mentioned anywhere on the site.

Fair Use Notice: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of issues of economic and social significance. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.


MOLS Denmark

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s